Dr. Ron Paul on The ED Show On William Kostric Wearing His Gun to the NH Protest

Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, joins the Ed Show to discuss whether Americans should be allowed to bring guns to protests like William Kostric did at a protest outside President Barack Obamas health care town hall. Vote Ron Paul in 2012!

This entry was posted in NH and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Dr. Ron Paul on The ED Show On William Kostric Wearing His Gun to the NH Protest

  1. RebelGuy95 says:

    Ron Paul doesn’t own a gun? Wow.

  2. romeoneverdies says:

    @FreelancePatriot76
    pussy liberals that dont want freedom should move to canada … where your rights can be revoked by laws !

  3. romeoneverdies says:

    @MooseOfReason
    most likely yes

  4. MooseOfReason says:

    Pres. Obama was safer with Kostric there.

  5. junior00bacon00chee says:

    @FreelancePatriot76

    haha, seriously dude? where did you get that idea? i own multiple firearms, i love guns. a well armed populace is the best defense against tyranny.

    i bet you’re more of a “commie” than me. you still support some taxation, don’t you?

  6. FreelancePatriot76 says:

    @junior00bacon00chee

    Nah…. you’re just a pussy liberal who’s afraid of guns. The guy broke no law.s
    Those who bring fully loaded glocks and AR-15s to communist rallies are Patriots !

    Pussy liberals who are afraid of guns are a threat to freedom.

  7. Sonnedude says:

    Wow Ron Paul is amazing!!!

  8. bonfirejovi says:

    is this the bill o’reilly of the left then?

  9. Z0mgZ0mbies says:

    Have a raised eye to those who say rights defy common sense.

  10. Chslosers says:

    I bet Ed can’t even name what type of rifles he has..

  11. bokiluis says:

    He is kinda cute though……

  12. mbarkhau says:

    “Shows remarkable restraint on the president”?
    “Obama deserves credit for this”?

    For what? Not interpretting the law as he pleases?

  13. jimfocus69 says:

    Say, doc, where’s you permit to call juvenile names on here rather than mount an intelligent argument? What if 5000 gun nuts show up wearing their glocks at a Presidential rally–ya think it might tax the resources of the Secret Service? Huh? Again, carrying a loaded gun to a presidential rally was the height of idiocy and irresponsibility. The President presents no immediate threat to him, and he could have causes a tragic incident. It’s idiotic to carry loaded firearms in large crowds.

  14. jimfocus69 says:

    What type of fantasy world do you live in? You actually advocate taking on a criminal you know nothing about with your own gun? Pure NRA/shooting range fantasies. Your best bet is to go to a safe location and call the police. You are not anywhere near qualified or trained to handle such a situation.

  15. DRfronkensteen says:

    Just to let you know, the guy carrying the gun was never even near the president. He was never even in the same building at the same time as the president. He was out side the whole time, in the area designated for protesters. Do you think the secret service would have let him near the president armed? Learn your facts before you open your mouth.

  16. DRfronkensteen says:

    So now my Glock .40 and my AR-15 are just “pea shooters”? So if they are just “pea shooters” there should be no problem carrying them around.

    Instead of gun permits, I think you should have to get a permit in order to be a condescending prick.

  17. mplspug says:

    Why didn’t I vote for Paul? The guy has too much common sense for Washington.

    He says he did it for attention and the only peopel I hear ranting and drawing attention to it is the left. Like Paul said, Obama and the Secret Service deserve to be commended for handling it as they did. I would be more concerned with the people who had their guns hidden that they could not keep track of.

  18. mplspug says:

    Love the name!

  19. TheLibertariansUnite says:

    ED is terrible…

    And they wonder why MSNBC’s ratings are in the toilet, it’s because of this junk journalism…

  20. JoeTravel says:

    Hay ED why dont you push a little harder for tougher gun laws, you unpatriotic tool!

  21. SoccerMU20 says:

    a frickin asteroid could have fallen right on Obama under the direction of Rush Limbaugh. Could have. Stupid hypothetical shit ED

  22. samatention says:

    JIMFOCUS69 — IDIOT

    It must be nice to call time out and wait 10 to 20 minutes for the cops to show up where ever you are at. To take care of the bad people. That is If cops ever do. While some one is trying to get at you.

  23. Oheeeoh says:

    MSNBC is no longer a valid news organization and this proves it.

    They have an agenda to push and don’t care in the slightest about presenting facts.

  24. proudtobewhitey says:

    your a dumbass ed! im sure the cops and sercret service had guns people could try to take too.we all know there was plenty of snipers around on the roof tops just in case,fn retard!

  25. OmarThePug says:

    Sorry Ed but we don’t want a country based on hypothetical prohibitions. Intent, premeditation, consequences of one’s actions should be the basis of all law. By that very argument, nobody around the President should be armed because of a hypothetical situation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>